<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attacks on GPL suggest it is winning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/attacks-on-gpl-suggest-it-is-winning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/attacks-on-gpl-suggest-it-is-winning/</link>
	<description>Free and Open Source Software News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/attacks-on-gpl-suggest-it-is-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=289#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Yes! Exactly correct! Oh snap, I just remembered a small point. A tiny, tiny point:

&lt;strong&gt;It&#039;s not MY argument.&lt;/strong&gt; 

Rather it is the argument of one of the quote-quote &quot;Most influential people in Open Source&quot; end-quote-quote. Which is why I provided the &quot;Inspired by&quot; link. I guess that&#039;s too subtle for some readers? Here I&#039;ll ruin the joke by explaining it, just for anyone else at the back of the class:

Someone who is among the quote-quote &quot;most influential people in Open Source&quot; end-quote-quote constantly fills a blog with the most idiotic and illogical arguments, and - surprise, surprise! - one of his favorite targets is the GPL and Free Software ideals.

By satirizing his own exact words - if one grants the trivial changes I made the lofty label of satire - we see how foolish not only his arguments are, but how foolish those are that put such spokesmen and arguments up on a pedestal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! Exactly correct! Oh snap, I just remembered a small point. A tiny, tiny point:</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s not MY argument.</strong> </p>
<p>Rather it is the argument of one of the quote-quote &#8220;Most influential people in Open Source&#8221; end-quote-quote. Which is why I provided the &#8220;Inspired by&#8221; link. I guess that&#8217;s too subtle for some readers? Here I&#8217;ll ruin the joke by explaining it, just for anyone else at the back of the class:</p>
<p>Someone who is among the quote-quote &#8220;most influential people in Open Source&#8221; end-quote-quote constantly fills a blog with the most idiotic and illogical arguments, and &#8211; surprise, surprise! &#8211; one of his favorite targets is the GPL and Free Software ideals.</p>
<p>By satirizing his own exact words &#8211; if one grants the trivial changes I made the lofty label of satire &#8211; we see how foolish not only his arguments are, but how foolish those are that put such spokesmen and arguments up on a pedestal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/attacks-on-gpl-suggest-it-is-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=289#comment-32</guid>
		<description>By your argument, then, we can deduce that Windows has completely defeated open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By your argument, then, we can deduce that Windows has completely defeated open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

