<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Moonlight, II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/the-future-of-moonlight-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/the-future-of-moonlight-ii/</link>
	<description>Free and Open Source Software News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:39:49 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/the-future-of-moonlight-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=326#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Saul,

Nice point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saul,</p>
<p>Nice point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saulgoode</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/the-future-of-moonlight-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>saulgoode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=326#comment-52</guid>
		<description>It was clever how MdI subtly worked that &quot;Free Software is communism&quot; jibe into his response. Not so clever that in responding to a criticism that the post did not mention &quot;GNOME&quot; or &quot;Linux&quot;, the defense was that he&#039;d mentioned that a particular project should move away from GNOME/GTK# towards basing itself on Silverlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was clever how MdI subtly worked that &#8220;Free Software is communism&#8221; jibe into his response. Not so clever that in responding to a criticism that the post did not mention &#8220;GNOME&#8221; or &#8220;Linux&#8221;, the defense was that he&#8217;d mentioned that a particular project should move away from GNOME/GTK# towards basing itself on Silverlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaQ</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2009/11/the-future-of-moonlight-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>TaQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=326#comment-50</guid>
		<description>&quot;That’s a major problem with Mr. de Icaza. He doesn’t just want to build on top of what exists, he wants to replace what exists; replace with closed-source, proprietary, non-standard technology!&quot;

That&#039;s a very good observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That’s a major problem with Mr. de Icaza. He doesn’t just want to build on top of what exists, he wants to replace what exists; replace with closed-source, proprietary, non-standard technology!&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a very good observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
