<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple puts the smackdown on MonoTouch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/</link>
	<description>Free and Open Source Software News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debt Management</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/comment-page-1/#comment-2184</link>
		<dc:creator>Debt Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=718#comment-2184</guid>
		<description>Apple continues to frustrate many developers and the situation with their Apps goes beyond the joke. I hope that Android takes off and teaches Apple to value developers more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple continues to frustrate many developers and the situation with their Apps goes beyond the joke. I hope that Android takes off and teaches Apple to value developers more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=718#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Well said Jason! I have always been annoyed that all Apps must be pre-approved and signed, but now they must be written in a pre-approved language! 
 
I&#039;m no programmer, but even I see how wrong and restrictive that is. Does Apple want to get the attention of the FTC?  
 
I&#039;ve never been an Apple &quot;fanboy&quot; but after this, and so many other recent examples I would no longer call myself an Apple customer.  
 
Looks like I made the switch to Android just in time :) 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Jason! I have always been annoyed that all Apps must be pre-approved and signed, but now they must be written in a pre-approved language! </p>
<p>I&#039;m no programmer, but even I see how wrong and restrictive that is. Does Apple want to get the attention of the FTC?  </p>
<p>I&#039;ve never been an Apple &quot;fanboy&quot; but after this, and so many other recent examples I would no longer call myself an Apple customer.  </p>
<p>Looks like I made the switch to Android just in time <img src='http://www.the-source.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leynos</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Leynos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=718#comment-530</guid>
		<description>The trouble is, it also precludes writing an iPhone/iPad app in Haskell, Erlang, Io, or what have you. 
 
Apple&#039;s general weirdness about these kind of things is the main reason I can&#039;t bring myself to buy an iPhone.  This being despite the fact that really enjoy writing in Objective C. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble is, it also precludes writing an iPhone/iPad app in Haskell, Erlang, Io, or what have you. </p>
<p>Apple&#039;s general weirdness about these kind of things is the main reason I can&#039;t bring myself to buy an iPhone.  This being despite the fact that really enjoy writing in Objective C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=718#comment-528</guid>
		<description>These rules are a joke. If you develop an app that directly competes with apple, they will block it. They wont even give you a reason, they will simply lock you out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These rules are a joke. If you develop an app that directly competes with apple, they will block it. They wont even give you a reason, they will simply lock you out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=718#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Leynos, 
 
Thank you for your comment! 
 
I don&#039;t see it as a trouble at all! I&#039;m quite pleased that Apple is ever more forthcoming on how closed and restrictive their platform -- indeed, their vision of computing -- is, and delighted that it disturbs those who poo-poo the concept of Free Software! 
 
I can hardly think of a better example to make the value of Free Software concrete than Apple&#039;s recent actions, and so I strongly hope that they continue to restrict and diligently enforce such rules. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leynos, </p>
<p>Thank you for your comment! </p>
<p>I don&#039;t see it as a trouble at all! I&#039;m quite pleased that Apple is ever more forthcoming on how closed and restrictive their platform &#8212; indeed, their vision of computing &#8212; is, and delighted that it disturbs those who poo-poo the concept of Free Software! </p>
<p>I can hardly think of a better example to make the value of Free Software concrete than Apple&#039;s recent actions, and so I strongly hope that they continue to restrict and diligently enforce such rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgl</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>jgl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 04:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=718#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or does it seem like mono is a solution looking for a problem? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or does it seem like mono is a solution looking for a problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.the-source.com/2010/04/apple-puts-the-smackdown-on-monotouch/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-source.com/?p=718#comment-520</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say mono is a problem and just stop there. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d say mono is a problem and just stop there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

